Energy & Industry
What would a revision of the CO2 Standards for cars mean for public transports, renewable energy production, and clean tech's industrial ecosystem in Europe?
Our members Eurocities, European Geothermal Energy Council, and Danfoss, all passed in front of the camera to bring their perspective to what a weakining of the 2035 emission targets would mean for, respectively, consumers interests, renewable energy developmenet, and industrial investments in Europe.
1/ Sanjeev Kumar (EGEC) on importance of cars' CO2 Standards for renewable energy industries in Europe
The synergies between electric vehicles and renewable energy sources are significant. For example, EVs can act as flexible loads and storage units, helping balance and match renewable energy production and consumption. In the geothermal sector, we see an added advantage. Lithium, a critical material for EV batteries, can be produced as a byproduct of geothermal energy extraction. This creates a synergistic relationship between clean energy, e-mobility and European industrial autonomy.
Reopening the CO2 standards would create uncertainty for investors and businesses, not only in the renewable energy sector but also for technologies that enable synergies between EVs and renewables, such as grid flexibility solutions. It could hinder the development of new renewable energy plants and delay the integration of innovative energy systems that are essential for a clean energy future.
If your goal is to decuple the energy demand by four times, then yes, synthetic fuels are the answer. A car running on e-fuels requires three to four times more energy to travel the same distance as an battery electric vehicle. So, if you want to build four times more wind turbines and other renewable energy plants to decarbonise transport, synthetic fuels might seem appealing (ironic). Besides, e-fuels can still be produced using fossil fuels, which doesn’t provide the clarity or investment certainty needed for renewable energy development.
2/ Thomas Lymes (Eurocities) on importance of cars' CO2 Standards for European city dwellers
While electric mobility offers significant benefits, especially when it comes to improving air quality and reducing noise pollution, the revolution won’t happen without strong and stable regulatory framework. The phase-out of internal combustion engines will push us to adopt more diverse, sustainable mobility solutions for urban residents and commuters. Together with a shift towards alternative modes of transport, the phase-out is the missing piece in the puzzle of a sustainable urban mobility.
Reopening the CO2 standards would create uncertainty for both public and private investments in cities. It would wobble the incentive of local authorities in designing and building the clean mobility ecosystems that benefit city residents. Cities mobility plans are build around the promise of a mainstream zero-emissions mobility. The same goes for investments in areas like charging infrastructure, road renovation, power grid upgrades, and smart infrastructure are crucial. Any uncertainty could stall these efforts.
Additionally, this would confuse consumers, delaying their vehicle purchase decisions and postponing the essential decarbonisation of transport in our cities. On that note, large fleet owners have a key role to play. We strongly welcome the announcement of initiatives to clean large corporate fleets as a way to accelerate the shift to zero-emission mobility and make it affordable for the majority of the population.
There’s still uncertainty about the cost of driving with synthetic fuels and whether they truly benefit air quality. We could only consider their use if we can ensure that e-fuels are at least as energy-efficient, clean, and affordable to operate as electric vehicles. Otherwise, they will not represent a viable alternative for sustainable urban mobility.
3/ Bonaldi Da Costa (Danfoss) on importance of cars' CO2 Standards for European clean tech industries
Electric mobility is central to Europe’s industrial future. The 2035 zero-emission cars goal provides a clear and stable framework that attracts investments into sectors like automotive, batteries, and infrastructure. CO2 Standards are actually Europe’s most straightforward clean industrial strategy, helping companies across the continent transition to a net-zero economy. Without this clarity, we risk slowing down investments and innovation needed to develop the net-zero industrial ecosystem.
Reopening the CO2 standards would create significant uncertainty for industrial actors who have already made substantial investments in this transition. It would penalize companies like Danfoss and others in the automotive, battery, and infrastructure sectors who have committed to zero-emission solutions. Attracting further investment is only possible with a consistent and clear regulatory framework, and reversing now would disrupt the progress we’ve made.
We have limited resources to invest in the clean tech revolution—whether it’s for research, development, and innovation or the infrastructure required to support the transition, such as charging networks. And so we simply don’t have the luxury to invest in two parallel value chains: battery electric and synthetic fuels, and their related infrastructures. Let’s focus our effort on tested technologies.
Furthermore, clean e-fuels will be available in very limited quantities, and they should be reserved for hard-to-abate sectors like aviation and shipping. For road transport, battery electrification remains by far the most energy-efficient option. Diverting resources to e-fuels for road transport would slow down the progress we need in more critical areas.